Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-27379271-20141228060237

Yes. We have the right to know both sides of a story and since Curiosity wants to conduct his voting in a professional manner, why can't we speak our voice too in the same manner? Let's look at both sides.

Horsy has been claimed by users to... Have been a bad admin Have been rude Have been cussing people out on other wikis Have been an unlikeable person Talk in the chat off-topic (don't we all?) Be bossy and arrogant Abuse her former admin rights Be brutally honest/fair (50/50 coin)

Kile has been claimed by users to... Be a bad admin Abuse his rights Bully and antagonise people Have rigged the elections Suppress the community's freedom of speech Hiding evidence of his unjust actions and playing it off Be two faced (we all have our moments)

I mean damn! Wow! Back to back admins claimed to be like this? And now we have a situation where one will be vilified in order to save the reputation of the other? No. We shouldn't stoop that low ever. We need to deal with this situation as fair as we can as a community. Hey! Whenever I'm in the chat, I try to bring a light mood but this.. This is serious. Open your eyes guys! If horsy leaves we lose, if she stays she's still blocked for three months!? What? Okay. This thread is for debating if these claims are true or not since the other thread won't allow you to have an opinion. Why don't we find a solution where both parties and most importantly the community can be happy with? Instead of all this BS. 