Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-200.123.210.2-20151016175625/@comment-26099764-20151022155528

excuse me what is wrong with you people? unwinnable? the only people i have seem complaining about james handy are those who failed to properly apply to the challenge

i honestly hope you are not talking about this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMtuWymUzz4&list=PLFDE8925734E2FC4B&index=7

look there is nothing wrong with skepticism, of the challenge was winnable through chance or tricks there would be no point on it

i'm terribly afraid that you people might have really low standards when it comes to proof and evidence

the challenge is very simple

1- they will check you to make sure you arent using any dirty magnet or prop (so we don't get a conman instead of a psychic)

2- they will experiments multiple times to rule out chance or coincidence (as the scientific method dictates)

3- they will develop a blind test that will rule out any sort of cold reading etc...

now tell em how is this rigged?