Talk:Pendulums/@comment-27800341-20150116054112/@comment-16838895-20150117053030

If you'll notice she wasn't the only editor.. I mean it were a blog and no one else had edited it, that's one thing. But this is a page, a contribution to the wiki made under our policy, that other people have edited and built upon. So if you worked on something and it had someone else's credits on there how fair is that? If you'll look at the history of the page, it's improved in quality greatly but that's because of people contributing the the information, rewording it and overall editing the page. So taking that and posting it somewhere else isn't just a matter of horsy giving permission for it, because that would be her signing off of the redistribution of other people's work. See what I'm saying? It's not just her page, it's everyones.

I mean if I went to the supernatural wiki in 2005 and wrote "Sam Winchester is deans little brother who had some weird stuff happen to him as a kid" and then came back in 2015 when the page has the entire summary of Sam's history throughout the show up to season 9 (current season ) because other people contributed to it, then I can't say "this is my page and i want to post it somewhere else" or "this is my page and I want it removed" because at that point it's not really mine, is it? If I did that I would be attempting to take other people's hard work and pass it off as my own.

So if it had been made a blog, sure thing. I wouldn't have a problem with it being posted somewhere else so long as horsy had agreed to let it be posted there. That's why when I noticed Stormmers blog had been made a page there I went and checked to be sure it was posted with her (his? .-.) permission. Because as far as I'm concerned a blog belongs to the person who made it because it has a clear author and no one else can edit/contribute to it. So it was no big deal. However a page is a different story ( see supernatural reference above )