User blog comment:Stormmer/Reviving Psi Wikia - Psionic Project/@comment-1901504-20160807154204/@comment-1901504-20160815204803

Agreeing to all points here, except the part with blending “philosophy” and psionics. Many people forget, that a (practical) system such like the one by Kant is specially made for scientific purposes and can be, if done rightly, also be practically used in scientific approaches, thus especially in psionics. One may be surprised how well this system works with psionics.

 Unfortunately, many people do not have the time reading Kantian literature and I also discovered that English countries seem to lack a lot of resources on Kant (at least I couldn’t find them online, probably libraries can help out here) which makes it even harder to grasp Kant’s system. As a German person I have the advantage of having a lot of resources (including very big dictionaries) on Kant. Kant gives well-thought proofs of laws a priori, that also apply in Magick/psionics and so on. Many people use these laws subconsciously, but by knowing and fully understanding them, people could actually achieve better and more control over their work. At least that’s what this all led me to and a few others I teach on this subject.





 I would appreciate it though if you can disprove the Kantian apriorical laws, because no one yet did and even Schopenhauer, Nietzsche and all their followers never really understood Kant and build up their own systems (which were founded on sophisms and many contradictions. Salomo Friedlaender, a german philosopher, showed this in a perfect way).

Blending philosophy and psionics, aka mixing it, is necessary as metaphysics is the foundation of any science we know today and for understanding psionics, a scientific way has to be taken and is already being taken (parapsychology, unfortunately following a wrong metaphysics (aka Hume and not Kant)). Kantian metaphysics is practically the only solution to this mere mess we call modern science (physics, chemistry, etc.) and get rid of pure empirism (Hume) and finally start agreeing that apriorism and empirism go hand in hand. It would solve many problems and it has been also shown already in what way this could help us A LOT! I do not want to try to force anything here, but if someone wants to achieve success, it would be better following a scientific way as this not only helps schooling the intellectual mind, it can also help getting people to get to know their noumenon (what others may call "soul", "spirit" or simply "mind") with which they access to "psi". I was teaching three people already which one of them actually showed a video of him moving a few objects such like a pen and a book by using the noumenal force people call "psi". To be sure, I arranged a meeting and he was able to prove it to me several times. And I was astonished how quick progress he made in just three weeks, while before he used to practice stuff from YouTube or sites like myTk (no offense here, that's just what he told me). This astonishment sobered after I finally understood that the apriorical laws as well as their theorems are which is necessary to actually practice good, real psionics. I have written a german book on this already, called "Theorie einer szientistischen Magie" (= Theory of a scientific magick - Just saying, Magick and Psionics mean the same here) and maybe I will be able to translate it into proper English once I find someone who's very good at both English and German.

Psionics follows specific natural laws, as well as magick follows specific natural laws. By knowing, understanding and analyzing these laws, one may find a faster access to noumenal forces. Maybe I might write a text on my blog to this subject, but it will be nearly impossible to fully describe my model here as my English is horrible and I have no idea how I would translate Kantian terms into English terms. Again: I'm not forcing anyone here, but having an unified scientific model might give the possibility of standardization and thus avoid confusion with many other models and paradigms that mostly build up upon (disproven) different mystical ideas, pseudo (non apriorical, non-existing) laws, etc. Also an unified scientific model would give access to a standard (maybe international) nomenclature, and thus the possibility of defining terms once for all without having to use many thousands of different terms for one and the same thing.