Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-2.219.210.165-20140114224346/@comment-24276288-20140117130657

Overlorg wrote: Are you serious, Science should not be constant or become predictable (under certain circumstance) because science is not finite there is no one law in fact the universe in our world is constantly changing and for science to exist it must constantly evolve and that mean occasionaly challenging the status quo in my opinion our current Science is in a state of stagnanation there may be pool of hope within the stagnation but it remain to be said that it core is rotten. this conversation is going the wrong way, i can feel you mistook what i said, ok maybe i expresses myself bad, when i said i was talking not about science the study but the fix laws of the universe like gravity, they dont disapear we dont see gravity disapearing from  day to anoher without a motive, we dont see tables floating around

"Science should not be constant or become predictable" it shouldn't it need to be, if there wasn't constant numbers we wouldn't be se even one 1% of what we can, in fact i could describe we could describe science as the art of catalog all constants of this world

"science is not finite" yeah but most scientists refrain from using infinite numbers in their works exactly so their equations can be constant, haven't you ever heared "the x constant"

all science in constant number & equations, if these numbers where not constant we wouldn't be able to know if when we strike a match it will burn or when we drop a apple it will fall down

"for science to exist it must constantly evolve" i wouldn't call evolving i would rather call fixing when science find that a explanation is wrong it tries to find a new one that can work but this is not cause the world changed its cause science was wrong

"our world is constantly changing and" most of them are predicted changes we have predicted from the sun death to the end of the actual universe all unpredicted changes are due to concepts that science doesn't understand in this case science tries to explain this unpredicted change, yeah in this point you can say that science is changing but it doesnt conflict with my statement because regardless of these changes if you strike a match it will burn ok take away hte constant pert and chage for realyable