Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-19903036-20160125060806/@comment-24415389-20160126215415

That sounds pretty good. It would really bring the attention of people that actually care about the site content, and even those who just like to pick something and root for it to win (like me).

The site's content really has gone down, quantity wise. I'm pretty sure at least twenty or so pages were deleated in the last two years, and only handful were added later on, adding the old stuff back through a voting process sounds pretty effective.

Another thing, though. What about the actual content? The idea is really good, and we do have an overall idea of what some things that could be re-added (like Biokinesis) are and how they supposedly work, but having three-line-long pages isn't the best thing, we need to fill it up with good material. How we can find the material for the page is my biggest doubt right now. Sure, its metaphysics and discussing it sounds like the simplest way to reach a consensus, but I think that would be the hardest part about all this.