Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-5553481-20160330135833/@comment-19903036-20160417200700

I'm just saying we have a tough enough time controlling air, and you are saying that a concept that isn't even certain to exist or not should be the next step forward? That umbrakinesis whether it be in your description or photokinesis... It's hard enough to cause a ripple in a bowl of water,

But you guys are talking about controlling light and dark matter like that's just a piece of cake. A substance that Supposedly created the universe, and one that travels at the highest speed imaginable.

To each his/her own in which abilities they believe in, but why? Why make psionics, an already tough concept to believe, tougher to start, and toughest to prove, why make it even more difficult on yourself by debating controlling two universal phenomonons as complicated as those?