Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25632587-20141106173606/@comment-24276288-20141107151537

Sh'çift wrote: still can't prove tele without being in person. too many damn camera angles and gimmicks out there yes but not necessarily

you can use skype to talk to someone on cam and move objects of the room as this person says

of course you could believe that all the objects of the room are rigged to move as you say with some mysterious gimmick x that cant be detected by cam

but let's be honest when someone resort to this kind of explanation its the same as admitting they can't explain it

besides it's not about proving psi scientifically by making a video where you move something you prove two things

1- that you aren't making things up or hallucinating (if it moves in front of the cam it wont be a just a anecdotal evidence it will me a video evidence that you are not deluded)

2- it proves to the one who is watching that its possible to learn telekinesis and that he isnt just wasting time (the effect of seeing it with your own eyes can be very positive to newbies)

you can hide anything out of the cam vision field but assuming that there is a giant magnet out of the cam vision is already out of the range of the ockham's razor

if the skeptic use this kind of absurd explanation or use the argument that videos proves nothing then he basically saying "i have no idea of how such a thing can be possible" and therefore losing

beside just because it can be faked with gimmicks it doesnt mean its telekinesis, i can fake a illness and many peoples do so but that doesnt mean illnesses are fakes

behind the avatar of the chat there could be anything a troll a deluded adolescent a crazy boy hallucination but when you make a video these possibilities collapse to 2 a real psychic or a faker