Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-29103410-20140318181354/@comment-19903036-20160304175752

Well seeing as Adfeng's monitoring my comments and taking them out for her own ambiguous reasons without giving it time to prove it's purpose... I'll just state what I said again.

Why don't you understand that you contradict yourself with everything you say in your comments? How can you say that you aren't saying you are right, just that I am wrong if we have opposing beliefs? It's all you have been doing this entire time is trying to use symantics, yet you are just doing it wrong. Symantics works on vague ideas or statements. Ones where Yes/No aren't the answer.

If you go up to a god believer with an opposing belief, you can't say that you aren't saying you are right, just that they are wrong. Symantics don't work on opposing beliefs, because it's one way or the other. Which i'd also like to point out that you are calling me a believer for not believing in something you believe in.

Everything you say is twisted like you're trying so hard to prove something, when all i'm saying is to have your belief but don't tell others not to have theirs. That's it. I'm not trying to be right about anything, i'm not trying to be wrong about anything.

I'm showing you your own contradictions... Also I don't got you wrong. You may want to have a look at the first comment I wrote, you are adament about being right over others, when you should instead worry about being right. You are in the same boat of ''according to what observasions or who's saying? you are saying it is anywhere with the same density? doesn't it look stupid to you?''

You want to see a few things you've said?

before you even start with time, you should first solve the paradox of energies in another dimension and their gravity fields followed by according to what observasions or who's saying?

you wrote it is much more complicated than something that some delusional old men that follow buda and traditions and etc that include believing, can figure out. which you immediately followed with i didn't mean that buddism doesn't have much about feeling, but those little parts that are not about feeling are really stupid

about energy, you said 'it is not everywhere. it is somehow connected with physics laws. laws that we know little about followed by i did not say that energy is not everywhere., which was followed by and yet i did not deny that energy is not everywhere. but when you say that energy is everywhere it should be according to something. and then with we can decide that energy is everywhere and it dosen't gather arond planets.'

And lets not forget. 'i am not saying i am right. i am saying you are wrong.' Ironic, since the topic was on our opposing beliefs of something.

All you do is twist yours and everyone elses words into what you want to hear and what you want it to mean, always side tracking and putting words into peoples mouth's.

'The majority of comments on this thread is more established on using perception to mess with time, which has nothing to do with gravity or relativisms. It's neurology. Which you read as me saying lol, time has to do nothing with gravity?'

If you aren't going to even try to see your own faults, how the heck are you going to call out anyone elses beliefs. But aye, I guess like you say.

you can never prove to a believer that he is wrong with sentences.