Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-5826675-20140917153256/@comment-24276288-20140930215213

PsykJames wrote: Electricity solar energy jing. It's all energy and can be manipulated. This is a video of a guy using Jing to knock over some cans http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyzLR3bSkuM I know it says TK but i spoke to him in the comments and he is familiar with Jing and has used it in this instance. I can bust glass with Jing. The thing about this is that people will start basing the validity of it based off of their own experiences. Ahmed says she can't do anything despite training for over a year and I can break things with it.

How are we supposed to do this? Why can't we just add and mark the page as debatable. I've spoken with people on here that say magic is BS yet that's a freakin' category. People are going to believe what they want to and reject what they want to. There are people who don't believe in Prerecognition but we have that. Some people here think that PyroK is crap but we have that. Some people think 99.999999999% of this site is bull but last time I checked 99.999999999% of the site is here. There are abilities that NOBODY has even CLAIMED to be capable of doing but they're still here. Just add the page for crying out loud...

i agree that many things on this wiki are bs and that they make assumptions with no proof or logical reasoning

i agree that false or inaccurate information should not be exposed in a wiki i used to think like that and i still think like that but you have to understand some things

1- there is no way to tell if a information is true as long as we take experience as proof even if we ask for someone to test it in the end this "truth" it's going to be based on this person experience

2- the wiki community will always insist on pages regardless of the authenticity because of their ulterior delusional motives

3- videos on youtube cannot under any circumstance be proof because anything can be faked on a video special things such as moving a piece of paper

4- because other people do wrong it's not a excuse for us to do wrong two wrong don't make one right