Thread:Truely Unknown/@comment-24340457-20140511214741/@comment-19903036-20140513232421

Beyond that it's pretty much like court.

If the prosecution has incriminating evidence against the defendant who cannot proof that it is false, then the defendant is seen as the guilty party.

Which really sucks because maybe it was just coincedental for that and the defendant didn't actually do anything wrong. Since Fiona didn't happen to screen the things Undertaker said then thanks to our lack of humanity we have to look at the facts and base our judgements on that...

But can someone who only look at facts for these kind of scenarios be blamed? Since humans have the ability to lie and have a tendancy to look out for their own best interest and not what is justifably right, we lose our reason for giving them the benefit of a doubt due to how easy it is to abuse ones trust. Plus we get this mindset from past experience where we know it's best not to just go off of what one say they have and have not done.

... The judicial system does suck though, xD. But what else can be done home slices... and im just ranting by the by. Not saying that this person or that person is in the right. Just that you two both have a valid reason for saying what it is you're saying.