User blog comment:Chriswalt/Psionic Revolutionary Society/@comment-75.87.67.69-20130913205857

This has a few problems, just with the way you're introducing and explaining it. First off, direct democracy means that every single citizen across the entire country or state involved votes on every little thing involving legal decisions. In other words, there can't be any decision on something until everybody in said state has voted, and not everybody wants to have the responsibility or burden of having to vote on everything. That's why the USA is a representative democracy, where you elect officials to represent the general populace of a region. Secondly, I don't see how you can be called an "Anarcho" Communism, when the definition of anarchy is the abscence of any form of government or attempts to control anybody in any way, and you're trying to set up some kind of communism. Thirdly, the entire purpose of communism, according to the man who developed the theory, Karl Marx, is to lead up to socialism. The official(s) in charge are given control of the state until a true socialism can be developed, at which time they step down and become like everyone else. Lastly, you can never avoid corruption in any form of state or national government. That's the main reason communism has never led to a true socialism. The people in charge all become corrupted by the power they are given.