Thread:Horsyqueen/@comment-10440420-20130604233604/@comment-5666947-20130605074915

Again though, it is not copyright material, plagarism and copyright infringment is quite different, however, I am not sure why you are being quite so huffy puffy about this when, infact, having a link to the original content, and having credit to the original author ( which will happen since that should have happened anyways )

is more then enough to avoid -plagarism-. You are citing the -origins- as the source of the material, and thus its not being written off as their own.

Do you even know what plagarism means? It means trying to pass it off as your own. So with Citation, and credit, and a link, it is no longer -plagarism-.

Without actually -going down and paying for copyright- or getting it -copyrighted via the internet- you -cannot claim copyright-, and since Qi Gong itself is public domain, unless you put your entire guide as a copyrighted -book- or -guide- you can't claim infringement.

And especially if you aren't getting any commercial usage out of it, you'd be sueing someone over spreading information about your own article, which makes no sense, what so ever. If you were making money off your article, or were, infact, copyrighted to the idea of Qi Gong, and the methods inside your guide, THEN you can make an arguement. But I doubt you went to that trouble, so again, can't claim copyright.

So what exactly is the problem here?