Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-5553481-20160309220808/@comment-25386902-20160312220629

Gacsam wrote:

TheAdfeng wrote:

Gacsam wrote:

Demoplayer Psi wrote: I vote yes for biokinesis and geokinesis. If it is possible to move small objects like a toy car with telekinesis then it is possible to move small stones with practice, if your are able to speed up healing of a wound or changes certain characteristics like eye colour then it is possible to perform psychic surgery (which btw is an actual thing for physical problems but takes many, many years of harsh training) to put bones back in place. Actually, the geokinesis was not removed because of it being implausible, but because there's no difference between using telekinesis on a rock and geokinesis. There is no difference between using aerokinesis, pyrokinesis, etc. and using (micro-)psychokinesis. They should all be combined into one page. All -kinesis terms are a form of telekinesis or psychokinesis and generate some amount of fluff. That is true, they're all psychokinesis applied differently, but if people want to say "pyrokinesis" instead of "pk on fire" then it's not really much of a difference. And one could always have a different perspective, approach and techniques for different -kinesis terms. It's easier for some people to understand them seperately plus having them under one page sounds kind of redundant either way, could add in each a subability of psychokinesis but adding them under one page sounds a bit much.