Talk:Pendulums/@comment-27800341-20150116054112/@comment-27800341-20150117050529

She may have posted it. But that doesn't automatically give wikia ownership. Nor does it mean it belongs to this wikia. Creative commons requires citation if the wikia does not own it. If she added her credentials that means it was uploaded under her explicit permission and is being shared under that law WITH her being the OWNER. Now if she hadn't added her credentials then yes that would be true. But considering that she did that makes her the original source of the works. Not the wikia and therefore dubs her ownership. In which this wikia is being ALLOWED usage of via her credentials. Removing of those credentials voids your use of the creative commons and this site is actually committing plagiarism at the moment. If horsy so wanted to she could technically ask wikia staff to remove the works and they'd be forced to if she proved she is the original creator. Which by process of time stamps and logs would be quite easy.

That said. Kile claims he wants others to contribute and if the pages are good and the techs useable will add credit to the owner. By removing existing credits and  subsequently trying to claim it as wiki property he's being a hypocrite. His act here has far reaching affects. Who wants to work on something they won't even be credited for? No one. Why would they?

Claim your creative commons all you want. But pull that one to a court. You'd swiftly find yourself slapped with plagiarism charges.