Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-24821496-20140415200801/@comment-19903036-20140418203217

I'm speaking of allowing everyone to see psionics the way they want. At least that's a fair opinion to have compared to these two wanting it to be done the right way.

Yet they preach nothing about what's actually right and just defend how the way the format is now is wrong only with what they accept. Which is fine, but you can't just go around dictating the opinions of the community. If you're going to argue on how it is wrong then first at least get some info to help back that up. Real info, not fake or completely off topic crap like this girl said shadows are dark energy, so since it's dark energy I can summon a dark angel.

Which Everland i'd like to say that if we were talking about any of that to begin with i'd tell you that i'd agree that that is pure bs, but you assume for whatever reason that I wouldn't agree with you and automatically used it as evidence against me without giving me a chance to say my opinion on that. You always write your comments like that, bringing 6-10 random examples on things we weren't even talking about and making my own opinion up for me against you and proving me wrong via that. AlSy mentioned this earlier. And by the way, whenever you quote me quote the entire phrase that I said. Don't purposely leave out the second half of the line that contradicts your point or re-word what I say in anyway. Then you're just putting words in my mouth that I didn't say. Stop doing that.

Back on topic though. As I said in my first reply, someone who understands psionics understands that all kinetics branch off of psychokinesis, and is just that bareboned. I am not against that point. I am against you guys deciding what is a correct way and what is an incorrect way of interrpereting what they get here. If someone wants to specify their focus of psychokinesis on one specific element and call it a name relating to it then that is fine. It is because it uses psychokinesis in a specific way. Manipulating the air and manipulating water with psychokinesis although they both are simply psychokinesis, are two seperate experiences in it's own. One person who spends a year manipulating wind, and one who spends the same time manipulating water may have to outstanding controls of psychokinesis on 2 seperate areas. Now if you take them and switch them to each others element, it's bound to have an adverse experience then what they were use to manipulating because manipulating water and manipulating air wouldn't feel the same.

Like drawing. Barebones a picture can just be a drawing or you see the medium being used as nothing but a pencil. But there are all sorts of techniques that seperate how one style of drawing will differ from another style. It could be the way they decided to shade, or maybe they focused one a specific set of elements in drawing, maybe they did something interesting with the focal point or the composition of the piece in general. Barebones it's just a drawing, or they just used a pencil, just like you're saying here that they are just using psychokinesis. But the time that they put into focusing on their own flow wether they specify it on the wind, or on fire, or electricity, etc, the more unique it is to them. And what is wrong with them seeing psychokinesis as just that, as long as they are doing something correctly that's the most important accomplishment. Not sitting here and correcting terminology all day for a living.

No one is sitting here forcing you to accept the terminology as we have it listed, so why are you trying to do that very same thing to them? Lamia made a similar point to this.

I just don't see what the point you are trying to accomplish is. All of the kinetic abilities have already been put underneath psychokinesis as a sub-category. To find Electrokinesis, you'd have to scroll over psychokinesis and find it underneath is sub section. I've asked this question many times, and both of you seem to evade it everytime.

Why are you being so critical about what one person calls a tomato?

If someone chooses to happily accept something that you yourself can't prove wrong then why would you want to do something like that?

So if you make any response to this post for any reason, please just answer this one question.

My Question. How is what someone else is learning affecting you.