Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-5553481-20160330135833/@comment-5647070-20160417190618

Arro Yunora wrote: Just manipulating dark matter. Now here's something that will get you guys on the same page. Don't give two different meanings to Umbrakinesis. I keep seeing people mention umbrakinesis can be one incredibly unproven ability over another incredibly unproven ability. How's about maybe...

Instead of having two different views of the same thing, try to make a solid definition together, that way other people who come up to umbrakinesis won't have the chance to be on two different perspectives like you two are now. Less confusion.

Better yet, hows about someone come up with an actual method to start in learning umbrakinesis. Just the basics of getting started whichever way you see fit. Since apparently it's Just manipulating dark matter.

And everyone else seems to be so certain of umbrakinesis being just manipulating photons. Everyone sounds so certain and conceited, like it's just Duh~ if you don't know it.

Since everyone is at the point where you can say it's just manipulating photons, and it's just manipulating dark matter, why not give a basic technique for others to get started? I'm just giving my definition as to show how it could be different from PhotoK, given that Dark Energy/Matter/Fluid could be proven. I'm not saying we should put up an ability that is the manipulation of shadows, especially when that can go right under PhotoK. I'm just saying that once scientists prove either of the three, then we should try to use my suggestion to rename UmbraK.